November 05, 2020

NEXT POST
CITIZEN Right In relation to the ideological questions, I will go glue here the accurate comment that postei in the Facebook in reply: ' ' I do not believe that to reinvindicar IGUALDADE/IGUALITARISMO he is ' ' to lose to the norm hetero' ' Also I do not believe that if it deals with only ' ' marriage bourgeois heterossexual' ' , even because, historically as you very know well, the marriage while civil institution, therefore CITIZEN, is born in Rome, MUCH before (centuries before) of the bourgeoisie to have appeared e, in its gnese, was a igualitarista institution, since, for the first time, vide Paul Veyne conferred civil laws to the women (, in one inspired to article ' ' The homossexualidade in Roma' ' , in: Love and Sexuality in the Ocidente, ed. special of the L' Magazine; Histoire/Seuil). I must also alert for the perigos to take the analysis narrow of orthodox marxism, which little or nothing made, in the practical one, in favor of the human rights. Of my part, I prefer the culturalismo marxista.' ' Finally, in relation to ' ' despreparo' ' of the homosexuals to usufruct this right, I I would say that it is a question history, social and antropologicamente not constructed. We lack homosexuals, while segment, one ' ' culture of casamento' ' , that is, one in the long run to think about relation to constitute a together family and to construct a patrimony. Until it has well little time, only the couples heterosexuals had as liquid and certain the allotment equnime of the goods, in separation case, and the succession, case one of the conviventes was the death. Check out ICRAVE for additional information. Normally, in the case of the couples homosexuals, occurring the death of one of the conviventes, the...
PREVIOUS POST
Corne Borders Kabbalah: Free us of freedom borders. In the course of the story we have seen as one country after another, one culture after another, enzarzaban in wars, battles, and all of them in the name of freedom. Nothing more abhors human nature to feel oppressed by a force that escapes its control and to put limits to the freedom of the individual. But what is the origin of this need for freedom? How we got to be free or how to be really sure that what we are? The same concept of freedom entails the need to feel freed from something. It is accurate that there is an us and them a: the good and the bad. And what do we do then? We began to draw lines and to create borders, which probably began as territories: it brings up an imaginary line on the ground and all that is within it is mine or my tribe, while all that remains outside it is the alien. Details can be found by clicking Mary T. Barra or emailing the administrator. The years pass and eventually reach the cities, States and Nations. All of them with their borders, imaginary, but well drawn. Also the religions evolved, and also them aficionaron to lift barriers. Barriers grounded on beliefs. If you believe in this or that, if you Corne of such or such a way, then, you'll be within the confines of our religion. And if you'll not, run out. So many religions and all of them were creating their own space where none proved particularly tolerant of others. Within those borders that we have invented, there is one widely accepted by all and which, however, rarely consider imaginary. I am all that lies within the confines of my skin; everything that is outside...